Estate Planning

As much as I enjoy writing about celebrity Estate Planning gone wrong, and less often, right, occasionally, a court opinion catches my attention. That’s particularly true when the decision will have lasting implications for Estate Planning. This blog returns to the basic lessons about amending a Trust. In an increasingly litigious world, disgruntled beneficiaries feel emboldened to fight for what they think is theirs. It doesn’t always work out in their favor, especially when they base their argument on a “technicality.”

The 4th of July reminds people of the flag, freedom, and fireworks! As our nation’s birthday approaches, we should reflect upon what freedom means to us. Creating an Estate Plan provides a level of individual freedom – a peace of mind regarding your family’s well-being and the legacy that you leave for them once you are gone.

More than one estate has boiled down to a fight over tangible personal property. Sometimes even if it lacks monetary value, it holds tremendous emotional significance for the beneficiaries. Maybe they remember Mom wearing a string of fake pearls or the no-name watch that Dad wore with pride. Things become more heated; however, when tangible personal property has value. Passing it on to beneficiaries requires a plan both during life and after death.

Certain individuals have a knack for making headlines. Orenthal James Simpson was one of those people. He first made headlines for his talent on the football field. Later, he made them as an actor and broadcaster. In 1994, he made headlines when he was arrested for the murder of his former wife, Nicole Brown Simpson, and her friend, Ronald Goldman. Orenthal James Simpson died on April 10, 2024, and with his death, his presumed Executor made headlines, perhaps for the last time for the “Juice.”

Grantors like the idea of placing conditions upon a gift. In many ways, it’s the final opportunity to exert control or influence on the beneficiary. Most courts try to uphold the conditions as long as they are not void as against public policy or otherwise illegal or immoral. This article explores what happens when a Trustee fails to strictly enforce the conditions placed upon a bequest.